fsa logo Help | Site map | Search | Text links |
Archive - MAFF

 

Home
Archive
MAFF
Dept of Health
Scottish Executive
The information in the archive was published by MAFF, Department of Health and the Scottish Executive before April 1st 2000 when the Food Standards Agency was established.

MAFF logo DoH
Food Surveillance Information Sheet


Number 142      February 1998 (revised April 1998)

MAFF UK - SURVEY OF NITRITE AND NITRATE IN BACON AND CURED MEAT PRODUCTS

This is a revised information sheet, reissued in April 1998, because the original version contained an error in identifying a Danepak bacon product as exceeding permitted limits.


Index to MAFF UK Food Surveillance Information Sheets, 1998

See also:
91: MAFF UK - Nitrate in vegetables (July 1996)
121: MAFF UK - 1996/97 UK Monitoring Programme for Nitrate in Lettuce and Spinach (August 1997)
132: MAFF UK - Survey of Added Water in Cured Pork Products (November 1997)
137: MAFF UK - 1994 Total Diet Study - Nitrate and Nitrite (December 1997)
154: MAFF UK - 1997/98 UK Monitoring Programme for Nitrate in Lettuce and Spinach (August 1998)
158: MAFF UK - Nitrate in Vegetables (September 1998)
163: MAFF UK - 1997 Total Diet Study: Nitrate and Nitrite. (October 1998)
165: MAFF UK - Duplicate Diet Study of Vegetarians-Nitrate Analyses (November 1998)
177: MAFF UK - Nitrate in Lettuce and Spinach (May 1999)

Summary

A survey of the preservatives nitrite and nitrate in 200 samples of bacon and cured meat products, from retail outlets in England and Wales, has recently been completed. Only one of the samples was found to contain levels above the maximum permitted residual limits which applied at the time the samples were taken. The full results, including brand names, are provided at Annex A. Trading Standards Officers have been informed of the results via the Local Authorities Co-ordinating Body on Food and Trading Standards (LACOTS). The retailer who sold the sample with a level above the permitted residual limits has also been informed. The company concerned was given the opportunity to provide a summary of its comments for inclusion in this Information Sheet. No comments were received.

The nitrite levels found were similar in both prepacked and freshly-sliced ham or bacon, whereas nitrate levels were on average higher in bacon and ham from delicatessens than in prepacked samples. Total levels of both nitrite and nitrate were generally similar across England and Wales and comparable with those obtained in the previous survey of cured meat products carried out in 1989.

Dietary intakes of nitrite and nitrate from cured meat products for high level consumers were estimated to be 19 per cent and 1 per cent of the respective Acceptable Daily Intakes (ADIs) for these chemicals. These data suggest that intake of nitrate was a quarter of that found for meat products in the Total Diet Study carried out in 1994, whilst intake of nitrite was the same.

Background

Traditionally a wide range of different types of meat have been preserved by the addition of chemicals such as common salt, sugar, salts of nitrate and nitrite and vinegar. These agents can also improve the colour and flavour characteristics of the product, although their primary function is that of a preservative.

Nitrite is a relatively strong reducing agent with antibacterial properties, although much of the preservation of the foodstuff is attributable to the high concentration of salts employed during the curing process, as is also the case for nitrate. In addition nitrate may act as a reservoir from which nitrite may be formed by microbiological reduction.

This survey was carried out to see if levels of nitrite and nitrate in cured meats had changed since these were previously considered, in 19891. It also provided the opportunity to see if any products had levels above those permitted at the time the samples were taken.

This is the latest in a series of surveys of nitrite and nitrate in food1-4,7. The previous survey of nitrite and nitrate in cured meats was undertaken in 19891. One sample out of 213 contained levels of nitrite and nitrate that exceeded the combined statutory limit in force at that time. In 1994, as part of the Total Diet Study, intakes for high level consumers of nitrite and nitrate from all dietary sources were estimated to be 3 and 137 mg/person/day respectively2. Vegetables were considered to be the single greatest contributor to these estimated intakes.

In Great Britain the use of nitrite and nitrate in meat products is currently controlled by the Miscellaneous Food Additives Regulations 1995, as amended (parallel legislation exists for Northern Ireland). These Regulations limit the maximum residual concentration of nitrite in cured bacon to 175 mg/kg and to 100 mg/kg in other cured meat products (in both cases as sodium nitrite). The maximum permitted residual concentration of nitrate in all cured meat products is 250 mg/kg (as sodium nitrate). However, the timing of this survey meant that, because of a transitional provision in the 1995 Regulations, the maximum levels of nitrite and nitrate specified in the Preservatives in Food Regulations 1989, as amended, could still be permitted. These 1989 Regulations limited the combined amount of nitrate and nitrite in cured meats to between 150 and 500 mg/kg depending upon the type of processing and packaging used.

This survey of nitrite and nitrate in cured meats is covered by transitional arrangements5 which have been put in place for surveys commissioned prior to September 1997. Samples were obtained before these arrangements were considered, and thus information on 'best before' dates was not recorded. However, brand names were recorded and are included in Annex A. The company whose product contained residues which were above the current maximum permitted levels has been advised of its result and given the opportunity to provide a 100 word summary of its comments for inclusion in this Information Sheet. No comments were received. The results of this survey have been provided to the Local Authorities Co-ordinating Body on Food and Trading Standards (LACOTS) and the Food Advisory Committee. The Committee's statement is as follows:

The Food Advisory Committee noted that the results of this survey were similar to those obtained from the previous one. However, they also noted that in a small percentage of samples the levels found were greater than the maximum permitted residual limits (since found to be the case for only one of the samples) and they therefore welcomed the action that has been taken to ensure that the respective traders and enforcement authorities had been informed of these. The Committee observed that the levels of these preservatives found in some samples were low and, whilst recognising that they are sometimes used in combination with others, stressed the need for manufacturers to ensure that their products contain adequate overall levels of preservatives to guarantee microbiological safety.

Methodology

Samples were obtained from supermarkets and other outlets in England and Wales. A total of 200 samples, 40 each from Wales, Northern England, South East England, South West England, and the Midlands, were purchased and analysed between December 1996 and February 1997. The sampling programme was designed to reflect recent changes in shopping patterns towards freshly sliced produce available from supermarket delicatessen counters or local butchers' shops.

Samples were transported to the laboratory and processed immediately. Each sample was finely chopped and divided into two, both parts being separately extracted using a hexane-water/borax mixture. Potassium ferrocyanide and zinc acetate were added to each sample, which was then cleaned up on a disposable cartridge. Samples were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with photo-diode array detection. To ensure that false results were not obtained due to other substances present in the sample, peak purity testing was carried out for positive analyses. Confirmation was carried out using a different HPLC column. The analytical method was based upon that described by Dennis et al6.

The samples were analysed in batches of 20 to 25 and a four level calibration set was included at the beginning and end of each batch. Two samples containing both nitrite and nitrate, were selected as in-house reference materials. These were analysed with each batch of samples to ensure that the batch performance was acceptable, i.e. within three standard deviations of the analytical quality control set mean. Each result represents the mean of at least two duplicate analyses reported to one decimal place.

The repeatability of the method for both nitrite and nitrate was found to be at least as good as that quoted by Dennis et al6. The limit of quantitation was 0.2 mg/kg for both nitrite and nitrate, and the recovery values obtained for nitrite and nitrate added to fresh samples of cured cooked meat were 92 per cent and 97 per cent respectively.

Results

The results are summarised in Tables 1, 2 and 3 and individual results for each product are listed in Annex A.

The majority of samples contained concentrations of nitrite and nitrate at less than half of the maximum permitted levels. However, in one sample the level of nitrite was above the maximum level laid down in both the 1995 and the 1989 Regulations.

The results of the survey were entered into a dietary intake computer programme and an estimation of nitrite and nitrate intake from cured meat products was obtained. The nitrate intakes for this survey represented a quarter of those reported for meat products in the 1994 Total Diet Study2. For nitrite, the intakes were similar to those reported for meat products in 1994. These findings suggest that current levels of nitrite and nitrate in meat products will not have a significantly greater impact on total dietary intake compared to those reported in 1994. A dietary intake was not estimated using the results from the previous survey of cured meat products as these were reported at the same time as the 1985 Total Diet Study7 which included a more extensive range of meat products.

A summary of the levels of nitrite and nitrate in the range of sample types analysed is given in Table 1. In both this and the previous survey, carried out in 19891, bacon and ham products were the largest categories in both surveys with over 50 samples in each group. Mean nitrite levels in these products in the 1989 survey1 were broadly similar to those reported here. The ranges of nitrate levels were similar for both surveys, although the mean levels in the bacon and ham categories were higher in the present survey. The results for other meat products varied considerably between the two surveys. Overall means (for all products analysed) for both the surveys indicate that nitrite levels were approximately the same, whereas the mean nitrate levels reported in this survey were somewhat higher than in 1989. However, this was probably due to a few outlying results rather than a general increase in nitrate levels in meat products.

Table 2 shows that total levels of nitrite and nitrate were generally similar across England and Wales. Samples from the Midlands had a lower mean nitrite content, whereas those from Wales gave the lowest mean value for nitrate. Nitrite levels were similar in both prepacked and freshly-sliced ham or bacon (Table 3). Nitrate levels were on average higher in bacon and ham from delicatessen counters than in prepacked samples.

Interpretation

Nitrate intakes calculated from this survey were a quarter of those reported for meat products in the 1994 Total Diet Study2. For nitrite, intakes from cured products were similar to those reported in 1994. Nitrite and nitrate levels in the majority of samples were within the maximum permitted levels. Generally the concentrations of nitrite and nitrate were below 50 per cent of their current maximum permitted level and, in around half of the samples, the concentrations of both nitrite and nitrate were below 10 per cent of their respective current limits. These latter samples were largely from a subset of miscellaneous meat products such as corned beef and turkey. Such levels may be below a concentration that, unaided, would normally be expected to effectively control microbiological contamination. However, most of the pre-packaged samples were found to include an antioxidant, sodium ascorbate (which is used as an adjunct to nitrite) amongst the ingredients listed on the label. This, together with the presence of salt, reduces concerns regarding the microbiological safety of the samples. It was not possible to determine if this was the case for loose samples.

In general terms, the data indicated that the concentration of nitrite ranged from less than 0.2 mg/kg to 120 mg/kg for bacon and less than 0.2 mg/kg to 170 mg/kg for other meat types. The levels of nitrate ranged from 1.4 mg/kg to 440 mg/kg for bacon and less than 0.2 mg/kg to 450 mg/kg for other types of cured meat. The average concentration of nitrite was found to be 24 mg/kg and that for nitrate was 62 mg/kg. These mean values for both nitrite and nitrate were well within the statutory limits, and are similar to those obtained in the previous survey of nitrite and nitrate in cured meat products1.

References
  1. Survey of nitrate and nitrite concentrations in samples of retail cured meat (1989). Steering Group on Chemical Aspects of Food Surveillance, Nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso compounds in food: Second Report. Food Surveillance Paper No. 32. p 58, (1992) HMSO.
  2. Food Safety Information Bulletin, No. 91, December 1997, MAFF.
  3. Working Party on Nitrate and Related Compounds in Food (1987) Nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso compounds in food. Food Surveillance Paper No. 20. HMSO.
  4. Steering Group on Chemical Aspects of Food Surveillance (1993) Dietary intake of Food Additives in the UK: Initial Surveillance. Food Surveillance Paper No. 37. HMSO.
  5. Food Safety Information Bulletin, No. 88, September 1997, MAFF.
  6. Dennis, M.J., Key, P.E., Papworth, T., Pointer, M. and Massey, R.C. (1990) The determination of nitrate and nitrite in cured meat by HPLC/UV. Food Additives and Contaminants, 7, 455-461.
  7. Estimated total dietary intakes of nitrate and nitrite in the UK in 1985, Steering Group on Chemical Aspects of Food Surveillance, Nitrate, nitrite and N- nitroso compounds in food: Second Report. Food Surveillance Paper No. 32. pp 62 & 66 (1992) HMSO.
Contact Point

For further information please contact:
Dr W A Matthews
MAFF, Joint Food Safety and Standards Group
Additives and Novel Foods Division
Room 228 Ergon House
c/o Nobel House
17 Smith Square
LONDON SW1P 3JR
Tel: + 44 (0) 171 238 6229
Fax: + 44 (0) 171 238 6263


Spreadsheet Tables

Annex A

Annex A Table A1: Concentrations of Nitrite and Nitrate in bacon products

Click here to download the Excel version of Annex A Table A1
Shift-Click here to download the .csv version of Annex A Table A1 (if you have any other spreadsheet package)

Annex A Table A2: Concentrations of Nitrite and Nitrate in ham products

Click here to download the Excel version of Annex A Table A2
Shift-Click here to download the .csv version of Annex A Table A2 (if you have any other spreadsheet package)

Annex A Table A3: Concentrations of Nitrite and Nitrate in other cured meat products

Click here to download the Excel version of Annex A Table A3
Shift-Click here to download the .csv version of Annex A Table A3 (if you have any other spreadsheet package)


Return to Index to Surveillance Information Sheets, 1998 page
Go to top of page

These pages were last updated on 31st March 1998

 
GREEN LINE

Help | © Crown Copyright  | Government Information Website |

Home
 | Archive  | Site map  | Search  | MAFF | Dept of Health | Scottish Executive |