fsa logo Help | Site map | Search | Text links |
Archive - MAFF

 

Home
Archive
MAFF
Dept of Health
Scottish Executive
The information in the archive was published by MAFF, Department of Health and the Scottish Executive before April 1st 2000 when the Food Standards Agency was established.

MAFF logo DoH
Food Surveillance Information Sheet


Number 94      October 1996

MAFF UK - TRADITIONAL REMEDIES AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS: SURVEILLANCE

Index to MAFF UK Food Surveillance Information Sheets, 1996

See also:

115: MAFF UK - Survey of Dietary Supplements Containing Vitamin B6

Summary

The final results from a project investigating adverse health effects arising from use of traditional remedies and dietary supplements are now available. The work was carried out on behalf of the Ministry and Department of Health by the Medical Toxicology Unit (MTU) of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital Trust, London. The aim of the work was to investigate whether the use of traditional remedies and dietary supplements were associated with adverse health effects.

A pilot project ran from April 1991 to March 1992. Results of this work have already been published 1 and suggested that herbal preparations/traditional remedies rather than vitamins/minerals should be targeted for more detailed follow-up. A further 4 years' surveillance was carried out between April 1992 and March 1996. Overall the results of the project did not indicate the existence of significant health problems for dietary supplements. However, the survey identified cases where the use of certain Chinese herbal medicines (CHM) were shown to be possibly associated with liver damage. Traditional remedies from the Indian Sub-Continent which contained high levels of heavy metals caused a number of cases of illness. Unlicensed products containing high levels of heavy metals are not in any case permitted under food or medicines legislation.

Background

In 1991 the joint MAFF/DH Working Group on Dietary Supplements and Health Foods published a report 2 which identified:

  • the potential for adverse health effects from dietary supplements and "health foods"; and
  • ways in which consumers might be misled by information (e.g. labelling, advertisements) about dietary supplements and health foods.

It noted that the boundary between foods and medicines was not always clear and that some herbal ingredients which were deemed unacceptable on safety grounds for use in medicines could still

legally be sold as foods. It was also clear that there were potential health hazards from dietary supplements and traditional remedies since at that time germanium, tryptophan, 'slow release' niacin and vitamin A had all caused concern. However, insufficient information was available to show whether serious or widespread problems were occurring. This was partly due to a lack of a specific scheme for reporting adverse reactions to remedies and dietary supplements and also to the fact that many health professionals were unaware that these products might have side effects and that they should therefore routinely ask patients about usage. To address these concerns and enable MAFF and DH to identify public health issues, a project was set up at the MTU.

The MTU provides medical practitioners and the emergency services with information and advice in cases of human poisonings. All enquiries to the MTU are logged, together with details such as the age of the patient, severity of symptoms and suspected causative agent(s). The MTU was thus ideally placed to carry out retrospective and prospective surveys of the cases reported to it and also to provide feed-back to the health professionals to raise their awareness of the potential problems associated with dietary supplements and traditional remedies.

Two specific problem areas were identified concerning the use of traditional medicines from China and the Indian Sub-Continent and both were considered by the Department of Health's independent advisory Committee on the Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) and MAFF's independent Food Advisory Committee (FAC). The Committees recommended that an education programme be undertaken involving herbal practitioners, GPs and the public about the potential problems from some of these remedies.3 They also recommended that suppliers should be advised of the need to comply with relevant legislation (e.g. the Medicines Act 1968 and the Food Safety Act 1990). However, they were concerned that there was still confusion about the legislative division between foods and medicines and suggested this should be re-examined to ensure that remedies are controlled in the most appropriate way.

The Medicines Control Agency has confirmed that where a herbal remedy is made up and dispensed by a practitioner, then it is considered to be an unlicensed medicinal product and as such is exempt from licensing under The Medicines Act 1968 and The Medicines for Human Use (Marketing Authorisations, etc.) Regulations 1994. However such products are also covered by the provisions of the Food Safety Act, which only specifically excludes licensed medicines.

Methods

One of the main aims of the work was to determine whether causal relationships could be established between the products used and the symptoms reported. Thus, as much background information as possible about usage of medicines, supplements and remedies was collected and wherever possible clinical and product samples were obtained and analysed as appropriate. In addition, clinical information from GPs and hospital clinics was collated.

Cases were classified as confirmed, probable, possible, conditional or unassessable with regards to the link between symptoms and products. These are defined as follows:

  • confirmed: there was confirmed poisoning, rechallenge or the effects were confirmed to be related to the activities of the ingredients of the products used;

  • probable: there was confirmed poisoning, rechallenge or the effects were clearly related to the activities of the ingredients of the product used;

  • possible: there was only a single exposure or there was a lack of follow-up information or it was not possible to exclude other causes;

  • conditional: here, despite considerable investigations, the final assessment cannot be made;

  • unassessable: information is insufficient or contradictory and cannot be supplemented or verified.
Results

An overview of the numbers of cases where people reported symptoms is given in Table 1. This relates to the number of enquiries where people reported symptoms after ingesting a particular product. The increased numbers reported during 1992 to 1996 reflect an overall increase in the number of cases referred to the MTU as a result of their efforts to increase awareness and encourage health professionals to consider the potential for adverse effects in people taking dietary supplements or traditional remedies. The majority of enquiries related either to vitamins/minerals or herbal products/traditional remedies with the latter category outnumbering the former by a factor of 2 to 1.

In Table 2, details are given of those enquiries in table 1 where a type of relationship could be established between the symptoms reported and the different types of products. In this table, herbal products and traditional remedies have been subdivided. It can be seen that in only 12 cases was it possible to confirm a link between the product and the symptoms experienced, nine of these cases related to traditional remedies from the Indian Sub-Continent. These were found on analysis to contain substantial amounts of heavy metals such as lead and mercury. The presence of the metals was not due to contamination but to deliberate use of the metals. A further case involved accidental poisoning with a Chinese liniment. When interpreting these data, consideration also needs to be given to the severity of the symptoms reported. In the case of vitamins and minerals, the main symptoms observed were gastro-intestinal effects which were transient and not serious. There was only one case where a direct relationship could be confirmed between product and symptoms. This was a male who suffered liver failure due to copper poisoning. He was found to have had a copper intake of 60 mg/day for 1 year and of 30 mg/day for three years. While this particular case highlights the need not to take excessive doses of supplements, the overall findings on vitamins and minerals do not point to their raising serious public health concerns.

The final confirmed case involved ginseng. An elderly patient developed hypertension after taking Siberian ginseng for 16 years but the effect was reversible i.e. it stopped when the patient stopped taking the supplement. The survey has identified cases where the use of certain Chinese herbal medicines has been associated with liver damage. Details of a number of the cases, one of which was fatal, have already been published4. Where analysis of the material in the Chinese herbal medicine was possible, no single ingredient could account for the liver damage. The reactions were not dose related and appear to be idiosyncratic.

Interpretation

Overall the results of the project do not indicate the existence of significant public health problems associated with traditional remedies and dietary supplements in general. The two groups of products for which the most severe adverse reactions were recorded were Chinese herbal medicines, which were associated with liver toxicity, and traditional remedies from the Indian Sub-Continent containing high levels of heavy metals. Herbal remedies when made up and dispensed by a practitioner, are regarded by law as medicinal products but are exempt from licensing. Traditional remedies containing ingredients not of herbal origin are not exempted from licensing. The Medicines Control Agency takes action to protect public health when problems arise through enforcement proceedings, restriction of supply and issuing warnings to users. It plans to extend its present monitoring of adverse reactions arrangements for licensed medicines to unlicensed medicines to facilitate identification of problems that require action.

The project has been useful in encouraging health professionals to become more aware of potential problems which may be associated with adverse reactions arising from the use of traditional remedies in particular herbal preparations. The MTU has liaised closely with practitioners of Chinese Herbal Medicine in particular during the course of the surveillance exercise and has encouraged them to monitor liver function in the patients they treat. It has established that in some of the cases reported herbs have been misidentified or the wrong herb supplied. A reference collection of Chinese medicinal herbs in the UK would help to remedy such problems and the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew have drawn up a proposal for such a collection. They are currently seeking a source of funding.

References
  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1994). Naturally Occurring Toxicants in Food. Food Surveillance Paper No. 42. HMSO
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1991). Dietary Supplements and Health Foods. Report of the Working Group. MAFF Publications.
  3. MAFF/DH Food Safety Information Bulletin No. 55 (Nov. 1994)
  4. L Perharic et al. (1995). Possible Association of Liver Damage with the use of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Skin Disease. Veterinary Human Toxicology 37 (6) p562-566.
Contact points

For further infomation on specific details of the cases and the way in which the work was carried out, please contact:


Traditional Remedies Surveillance Project
Medical Toxicological Unit
Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital Trust
Avonley Road
London SE14 5ER
Tel: +44 (0) 171 717 5382
Fax: +44 (0)171 635 1056

For further information about the project in general please contact:


Dr Julie Norman/ Dr David Atkins
MAFF, Food Safety and Science Group
Food Contaminants Division
Ergon House, c/o Nobel House
17 Smith Square
Tel: +44 (0) 171 238 6198
Fax: +44 (0)171 238 5331

A copy of the report entitled "Toxicological problems resulting from exposure to traditional medicines and food supplements" can be obtained from:


The Library
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
Rm 807 Nobel House
17 Smith Square
London SW1P 3JR
Tel: +44 (0) 171 238 6575

Price: £11.20 + £1.50 post and packaging.


Return to Index to Surveillance Information Sheets, 1996 page
Go to top of page

These pages were last updated on 1 October 1996

 
GREEN LINE

Help | © Crown Copyright  | Government Information Website |

Home
 | Archive  | Site map  | Search  | MAFF | Dept of Health | Scottish Executive |