Number 63 June 1995
MAFF UK - SURVEY OF FRUIT JUICES AND TOMATO PRODUCTS FOR PATULIN
Index to MAFF UK Food Surveillance Information
Sheets, 1995
See also:
16: MAFF, UK - Patulin in apple juice -
1993 survey (October 1993)
24:
MAFF, UK - More on patulin in apple juice - comparison of analytical methods for
patulin in apple juice (February 1994)
29: MAFF, UK - Survey of apple products for
patulin (May 1994)
36: MAFF, UK -
1994 survey of apple juice for patulin (September 1994)
74: MAFF, UK - 1995 survey of apple juice for
patulin (September 1995)
97: MAFF
UK - 1996 Survey of Apple Juice for Patulin (October 1996)
173: MAFF UK - 1998 Survey of Apple Juice
for Patulin (April 1999)
Summary
A survey for patulin contamination of retail fruit juices and tomato
products has been completed. Patulin contamination was not detected in any of
the 128 fruit juice samples or any of the 26 tomato product samples.
Background
Surveillance of patulin in apple juice has been carried out previously. In
1992, following the detection of higher concentrations in some samples than
found in previous surveillance exercises, the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals
in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) recommended that patulin
concentrations in food should be reduced to the lowest technologically
achievable. The Food Advisory Committee (FAC) subsequently set an advisory
level of 50 µg/11. Further surveillance
was carried out in 1993 to monitor the effectiveness of industry's actions to
reduce patulin contamination of apple juice. Canned fruit in apple juice was
also surveyed2. In addition, surveillance was
carried out to assess the extent of patulin contamination of other products
containing significant amounts of apples3.
Most recently in 1994, a follow-up survey of patulin in apple juice was carried
out to monitor the continuing effectiveness of industry's action to control
patulin contamination4. The current survey
covers other fruit juices and tomato products.
The Survey
128 samples of fruit juices and 26 samples of tomato products (pastes and
purées) were analysed from a range of different retail outlets. As far
as possible the samples were obtained in duplicate, the second sample being
intended for reference or as a back up. The types of samples analysed were as
follows:
Fruit juice
|
Total No. Samples
|
|
Orange
|
27
|
|
Grapefruit
|
19
|
|
Pineapple
|
21
|
|
Apple
|
17
|
|
Pear
|
16
|
|
Red Grape
|
12
|
|
White Grape
|
8
|
|
Other juices
|
8
|
TOTAL
|
128
|
Tomato product
|
Total No. Samples
|
|
Creamed
|
1
|
|
Passata
|
3
|
|
Paste
|
5
|
|
Purées
|
15
|
|
Sieved
|
2
|
TOTAL
|
26
|
Method of Analysis
The analytical method employed extraction with chloroform : methanol (97 :
3), followed by clean up with a silica solid phase extraction cartridge.
Analysis was performed by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC), with UV detection at 276 nm5. Recovery
values were in the range 51 - 91 per cent for juices and 37 - 61 per cent for
tomato products. The limit of determination for patulin was 5 µg/1 for
juices and 10 µg/kg for tomato products. When corrected for recovery,
these limits of determination were 10 µg/1 and 20 µg/kg respectively.
The limits of determination were based on the conservative assumption of a worst
case recovery value.
Results
None of the samples contained patulin at or above the limit of
determination.
Interpretation
It is reassuring that patulin was not detected in any of the samples of the
present survey even though the contamination of fruit juices and tomato products
has been previously suggested. When compared with the FAC's advisory level of
50 µg/l for apple juice, it is clear that neither the fruit juice samples
nor the tomato product samples provide any cause for concern. The results of
this survey support MAFF's current surveillance strategy on patulin which is to
target those brands of apple juice produced directly from the pressed fruit,
where there is evidence of a contamination problem, rather than those products
made from concentrated apple juice. A survey of these apple juices is currently
underway and will be reported later this year.
References
- Food Surveillance
Information Sheet No. 16.
- Food Surveillance
Information Sheet No. 24.
- Food Surveillance
Information Sheet No. 29.
- Food Surveillance
Information Sheet No. 36.
- AOAC Official Methods 1990, 974.18.
For further information please contact:-
Mrs Chelvi Leonard
MAFF, Food Safety and Science Group
Food
Contaminants Division
Room 210 Ergon House
c/o Nobel House
17 Smith
Square
London
SW1P 3JR
Tel:- (+44) (0)171 238 5734
Fax:- (+44) (0)171 238 6591
Return to Index to Surveillance Information Sheets, 1995 page
Go to top of page
These pages were last updated on 1 October 1996