Number 53 February 1995
MAFF UK - ANALYSIS OF BEE PRODUCTS FOR HEAVY METALS
Index to MAFF UK Food Surveillance Information
Sheets, 1995
see also:
93: MAFF,UK - Multi element analysis
of infant foods - follow-up survey (August 1996)
146: MAFF UK - Concentrations of
metals and other elements in selected snack and convenience foods (March
1998)
156: MAFF UK - Metals and Other
Elements in Dietary Supplements and Licensed Medicinal Products
(November 1998)
190: MAFF UK - Metals and other
elements in infant foods (November 1999)
Background
In March 1994 MAFF became aware of a problem of elevated concentrations
of lead in dietary supplements containing propolis, (Bulletin Number 48,
April 1994). Propolis is a mixture of plant exudates, beeswax and pollen
produced by bees. Following discussions between the Department of Health,
MAFF representatives and the product manufacturers/distributors, all
products which contained lead concentrations above the legal limit of 1
mg/kg laid down in the Lead in Food Regulations 1979 (as amended) were
immediately withdrawn, and action taken to prevent the marketing of
further products that did not conform with the legal limit. Additionally,
the Health Food Manufacturers Association which represents most of these
companies undertook to prepare a specification for propolis to which their
members must adhere and which would ensure that contamination of future
products would be minimised. To ensure that other bee products were not
similarly contaminated and to obtain further information as to the likely
source of the contamination, MAFF undertook a small survey of bee products
which included honey, pollen and raw UK harvested propolis for lead and
cadmium. The results of these analyses are now available.
Results
Honey samples were obtained from retailers (16 samples - all imported)
and apiarists throughout England (17 samples) and analysed using
inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Samples included
both set and clear honey, one sample of which contained a piece of honey
comb. The results of the analyses were reassuring since the lead
concentrations reported were low, ranging from 0.01 to 0.2 mg/kg. These
values are comparable with previously reported MAFF surveillance data.
There was no apparent difference between the lead concentrations observed
for English honey and those of the pure and blended imported products.
Cadmium concentrations for these samples were also low, lying between the
limit of determination (0.04 mg/kg) and 0.18 mg/kg.
Five pollen samples provided by members of the British Bee Keepers
Association (BBKA), (four English and one of Spanish origin) were found to
contain lead concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 mg/kg. The samples
were analysed in duplicate and found to be inhomogeneous, with a mean lead
concentration for all ten analyses of 0.62 mg/kg. One sample of imported
organic bee pollen grains (a dried granulated pollen product) produced for
human consumption was also analysed in duplicate and the mean lead
concentration found to be 0.2 mg/kg. The cadmium concentrations reported
for all pollen samples analysed were unexceptional and very low, ranging
from 0.06 to 0.13 mg/kg.
Analysis of 20 propolis samples, also donated by the BBKA members from
locations throughout England revealed widely varying lead and cadmium
concentrations. Repeat analyses indicated the extremely inhomogeneous
nature of the propolis. The concentrations varied by as much as 118 mg/kg
- between 343 and 461 mg/kg - for a single sample. Overall the lead
concentrations of all 38 analyses ranged between 2.3 and 461 mg/kg and
these results are illustrated by a histogram shown in
Figure 1. The concentrations found are similar
to previous surveillance data and literature values reported for both UK
and imported samples. The elevated lead concentrations appear to be
inherent in this product and reflect the diverse sources from which the
bees forage material to produce propolis. Likewise the cadmium
concentrations reported for these samples also showed considerable
variation and concentrations ranged between the limit of determination (<0.07
mg/kg) and 3.8 mg/kg. The cadmium concentrations were generally higher
than would be found in most foods. These results indicate that the
previously reported contamination of dietary supplements can be attributed
to their propolis content.
Table 1: Concentration (mg/kg) of lead and cadmium in samples of
honey, pollen and propolis. |
Sample/Element |
Number of samples |
Lead (mg/kg) |
Cadmium (mg/kg) |
Honey |
|
|
|
|
British |
17 |
<0.04-0.2 |
0.04-0.18 |
|
Imported |
16 |
0.01-0.18 |
<0.05-0.09 |
Pollen |
|
|
|
|
British |
4 |
0.3-1.5 |
<0.07-0.13 |
|
Imported |
1 |
0.1-0.14 |
0.07-0.1 |
|
Imported pollen grains for human consumption |
1 |
0.18-0.22 |
0.06-0.07 |
Propolis |
|
|
|
|
British |
20 |
2.3- 461 |
<0.07-3.8 |
Interpretation
The survey results show that honey and pollen contain low concentrations
of lead and cadmium and their consumption is not a hazard to health.
Although the propolis samples analysed for this survey all contained lead
concentrations in excess of the 1 mg/kg permitted in foods, none of these
samples was intended for use in food supplement capsules. Manufacturers
and suppliers of these supplements are aware of the inherent problem of
elevated lead concentrations in propolis and have agreed to ensure that
all their propolis products contain levels of lead of 1 mg/kg or less.
The Lead in Food Regulations 1979 (as amended) apply to all
propolis products intended for human consumption and as such should not
contain lead concentrations in excess of 1 mg/kg. The elevated lead
concentrations reported for this survey indicate the need for
manufacturers to purify the raw propolis to an acceptable quality such
that its use in foods does not lead to a breach in the regulation.
Contact point
For further information, please contact:
Dr Gillian Ysart
MAFF, Joint Food Safety and Standards Group
Food Contaminants Division
Rm 238, Ergon House c/o Nobel House
17 Smith Square
London SW1P 3JR.
Tel: +44 (0)20 7238 6064
Fax: +44 (0)20 7238 5331
Return to Index to Surveillance Information Sheets, 1995 page
Go to top of page
These pages were last updated on 1 October 1996